fbpx

The ABCs of Morphology: False Positives in Terminology Management

Nimdzi Finger Food is the bite-sized and free to sample insight you need to fuel your decision-making today.

If you are looking for more tips and best practices on terminology management, contact us today to become a Nimdzi Partner and benefit from unlimited Office Hours.

To continue Nimdzi’s series of Finger Food posts on terminology management (including this one and this one), let’s talk about morphology. The aim of morphology includes the definition of a word as a language object and a description of its internal structure.

Morphology is all about how words are formed: their roots, compounds, declensions, conjugations, and relations with other words. To make the word analysis, morphology looks into the structure of words and their parts (e.g., stems, prefixes, suffixes).

Source: Queen's University

Some languages are more "highly inflected," meaning the word form may change depending on grammatical case, gender, and number. Examples of highly inflected languages include Slavic languages, Latin and Romance languages and certain Germanic languages. In translation, morphology becomes crucial for terminology control. A simple word form that can be used as a noun, a verb, and part of a compound noun in English can translate into multiple word forms in other languages. 

Take, for example, the English word “database.” You store data in a database, export from a database, and you have multiple databases. When you translate these word forms (database/databases) into an inflected language such as Russian, you may have up to 12 word forms in a single text.

English Slovak Russian
Singular:
base
base’s
Singular:
báza
bázy
báze
bázu
báze
bázou
Singular:
база
базы
базе
базу
базой
базе
Plural:
bases
bases'
Plural:
bázy
báz
bázam
bázy
bázach
bázami
Plural:
базы
баз
базам
базы
базами
базах

When you run a terminology check (with a tool comparing a translation with nominative glossary entries), you may get false positives in 10 of these cases. This escalates into wasted hours of running through terminology reports full of false positive errors that could have been avoided.

As the strategy of morphological control is different for different languages, some language technology providers argue that the morphology-related functionality would be better supported in Translation Management Systems and CAT-tools. But others treat morphology with due respect. For example, they may use specifically developed morphological engines. There are also tools like Term Morphology Editor which helps during the preparation of termbases for efficient term recognition.

Some examples of dealing with morphology in terminology management:

  • In Kaleidoskope’s quickTerm the search for terminology can include stemming and decomposition: users can search in several languages simultaneously and benefit from the morphological stemming of checkTerm.
  • Lingo24's termfinder has statistical forms for terms.
  • memoQ's QTerm features prefix-based term matching.  
  • When Terminotix’s LogiTerm searches a term, it searches for many different forms (plural/singular, gender, tense, etc).
  • Tilde uses a more sophisticated approach of dividing languages into groups and supporting the morphology of each language in a distinct way.

All these methods help control terminology more efficiently. When you run a terminology check, you won’t get as many false positives as you would in tools where morphology is not supported. This helps save time and effort on terminology maintenance.

Nimdzi Finger Food is the bite-sized and free to sample insight you need to fuel your decision-making today.

If you are looking for more tips and best practices on terminology management, contact us today to become a Nimdzi Partner and benefit from unlimited Office Hours.

Stay up to date as Nimdzi publishes new insights.
We will keep you posted as each new report is published so that you are sure not to miss anything.

Related posts